2005 (5) TMI 313

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocates, for the appellants.   Manish Singhvi and P.V. Yogeswaran, Advocates, for the respondent.   --------------------------------------------------   ORDER   Leave granted. 2.. The respondent was transporting dry fruits between Delhi to Pali in Jodhpur. The respondent's truck in which its goods were carried was intercepted and twelve pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The writ petition was disposed of See page 499 supra. on the basis of agreement of counsel for the State that steps would be taken to make payment, as provided under section 83 of the Act. However, it was submitted that the payment would be made after the State adjusted the penalty which had been levied on the respondent. 4.. Despite having agreed before the learned single Judge, the appellant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ods from the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer who had issued the notice under section 83(1) of the Act. 6.. Learned counsel on behalf of the appellants has reiterated the same submissions as had been taken before the division Bench, namely, that the appeal was pending from the order of the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer. However, admittedly there was no stay of the order of the ACTO by the ap....