2001 (8) TMI 1154

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - M/s. Omega Agro Ltd. had filed stay application and appeal along with the appeals of the Directors challenging the confiscation of 30 drums of Epichlorohydrin and demanding duty on the same besides duty of Rs. 30,000/-. There is also penalty of Rs. 2,51,427/- on M/s. Omega Agro Pvt. Ltd. and similar amount on the two separate Dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. Therefore, it was adjourned to 24-4-2001. The ld. Counsel undertook to file his vakalatnama. Therefore, the matter was adjourned as last on 8-5-2001. On 8-5-2001 the ld. Counsel pointed out that the Company has been ordered to be wound up. Notice to be issued by the High Court of Bombay was directed to be issued and in the meanwhile the Counsel had prayed for interim stay of recovery of penalty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issued to the official liquidator. No one appeared on behalf of the Official Liquidator attached to the High Court of Bombay, as per the direction given by the Tribunal. Shri V.S. Suresh seeks for adjournment in the matter. However, he has no vakalatnama or authority to appear on behalf of the official liquidator. 4. The ld. DR pointed out that the appeal of the Company does not survive in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rther, notice of hearing had also been issued for today's hearing. There is no response from the official Liquidator of High Court of Bombay. He has not impleaded himself in terms of Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules. Therefore, the prayer of the ld. DR for dismissal of the appeal is required to be accepted. The stay application No. C/2082-R/98 and Appeal No. C/847-R/98 BOM is dismissed as ab....