Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....na, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The appeal is by the assessee. It is against the imposition of penalty on them by the adjudicating authority under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. The department had, by show cause notice [SCN] issued to the appellants, proposed to disallow Modvat credit to the tune of Rs. 2,38,87,173/- and recover the amount under Rule 57....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r imposing any penalty on the noticee. Even otherwise, counsel submits, no penalty could be imposed where the demand of duty was vacated. He relies on the decision of this Tribunal in Bhawani Castings Ltd. v. CCE [2000 (119) E.L.T. 591]. The JDR reiterates the penalty-related observations contained in the impugned order. 4. Examined the submissions. The submissions made by the counsel have....