Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - This appeal of the Revenue was argued by Shri Jain. Respondents were not present in spite of notice. 2. The respondents manufacture computers. The dispute was on the valuation thereof. The assessees had not justified the deduction on account of freight by producing proof of actual freight paid. The As....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the value of the system software had been included in the cost of the computers and that the value of the application software was not includible. The contest is on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) had accepted the claim of the assessees without insisting on any proof. We find that he found "substantial force" in the submission of the assessees. Although the order does not show whethe....