Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 1094

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri T.D. Bodade, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The question for consideration in this appeal is the validity of the show cause notice dated 26.6.95 issued to the appellant proposing recovery of duty on a product, Flucort-C-skin ointment manufactured and cleared by it between July, 1990 and October, 1992. The basis for the demand of duty was that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e department was fully aware of the presence of the two ingredients and continued to extend the exemption. Appeal is therefore clearly barred by limitation. 3. The Departmental Representative relies on the Commissioner's finding that this is to the effect that the product in question was shown in the classification list to contain only one ingredient, fluocinolone acetonide. 4. In ....