2001 (12) TMI 655

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A.S. Bedi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  In this application, the appellants have alleged that certain submission made by them before the Bench at the time of hearing on the appeal was not considered and that such non-consideration amounts to apparent mistake, which requires to be rectified under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. From para 2 of the application, thei....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore, prays for deleting para 8 from the final order after taking into account the ratio of the cited decision of the Tribunal. 4. Ld. SDR, on the other hand, submits that the plea of financial hardships made by the assessee has been well taken care of in para 8 of the final order of this Tribunal. He further submits that the alleged ground of non-consideration of case law at the final he....