1998 (11) TMI 544
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... T.L.V. Iyer, Senior Advocate (G. Prakash and Mrs. Beena Prakash, Advocates, with him), for the appellant in C.A. No. 2428 of 1997. Debi Pal, Senior Advocate (E.M.S. Anam and Fazlin Anam, Advocates, with him), for respondent No. 1. G. Prakash and Mrs. Beena Prakash, Advocates, for the appellants in C.A. Nos. 2429 to 2449 of 1997. -------------------------------------....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er this material. The respondents-assessees moved the High Court in tax revision cases. The High Court considered the material and reached the conclusion that standing rubber trees were not timber and, therefore, not exigible to sales tax under the provisions of the said Act. 2.. There can be no doubt that, in the circumstances, the Tribunal should have considered the materials that were placed b....