Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (6) TMI 726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order]. - This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the Order No. S/14-7-9/80-PINT SD/INT/143/80 AP dt. 16-7-1981 whereunder Additional Collector of Customs (P) R & I Bombay confiscated jewellery valued at Rs. 1,07,255/- foreign currency of various countries and Indian currency of Rs. 5,400/-. The Additional Collector found the appellant before me guilty to Section 111(d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a NRI wife to businessman may not brought jewellery which is of a personal nature and she has with her TRA Form and the entire action of the appellant at the time of incident is only a bona fide. Since the two members Bench of the Tribunal is on that particular way the matter which is before me as a single member case is binding on me. 2. Ld. JDR Shri J.M. George would states that facts n....