1998 (8) TMI 491

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. D. Sudershan Reddy for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Umesh Chandra Banerjee, CJ.-This appeal is directed against the interlocutory order of the Company Law Board in terms of section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 10F of the Act expressly provides that an appeal would lie to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Company La....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on or findings as to prima facie case, balance of convenience, and the interest of justice which are settled considerations for grant of any interim order pending disposal of main company petition? (2)Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Company Law Board is right in concluding that subsequent events cannot be taken into account while considering the application filed for in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7 and 398 read with regulation 44 of regulations framed under section 10E of the Companies Act while rejecting the application of the petitioner for an appropriate interim order, pending disposal of main petition ? (5)Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the action of the respondents in calling for rights issue without there being a special resolution in a general meeting is val....