Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....S/Shri R. Santhanam and Gautam Chugh, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  The above captioned appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the common order-in-appeal dated 26-3-2002 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) had reversed the order-in-original of the A.C. regarding fixation of ACP of the unit of the respondents. 2. The issue i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-in-original of the adjudicating authority. In that case, the Larger Bench has also over-ruled the ratio laid down in M/s. C.M. Prints (supra), relied upon by the adjudicating authority. 4. We have heard both the sides and gone through the record. 5. The bare perusal of the impugned order shows that while following the Larger Bench decision in Sangam Processors case (supra), the le....