1994 (2) TMI 260
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ocate, for the respondents. T.V.S.N. Chari and Ms. Promila Choudhary, Advocates, for the appellant. -------------------------------------------------- ORDER Civil Appeal No. 491 of 1977: This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing the tax revision case filed by the respondent-assessee under section 22 of the And....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nte-dated, and therefore, it is bad. The High Court accepted this submission but on a different reasoning. The High Court was of the opinion that every order must be communicated within a reasonable period and since the order of the Deputy Commissioner in this case was not so communicated, the High Court declared that the respondent-assessee shall not be bound by it. This was done by the High Cour....
TaxTMI