2001 (5) TMI 791
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....C. Sankhla, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - M/s. U.P. State Electricity Board has filed the present application for rectification of mistake (ROM), which is placed in the paperbook. In the grounds A - P, it has been prayed that their Review/ROM be allowed and the precedent, earlier decisions and the notification No. 51/78 be considered and the benefit u....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e were some earlier decisions of the Tribunal, which had been referred to by the appellants but they have not been followed in the present order by the Tribunal. He refers to Grounds A and C in which a number of decisions have been referred to. 3. We have heard Shri R.C. Sankhla, JDR and have gone through the facts on record. 4. We find that the Tribunal had dictated and pronoun....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er of the Tribunal. We find that what the applicants have desired is the review of the order already passed. We do not find any merit in the present ROM application. 5. Shri Y.P. Singh, ld. Advocate refers to the Ground No. 6 at page 4 of the ROM application, which is extracted below :- "(vi) That on the directions given and the order passed by the Hon'ble CEGAT the case was....
TaxTMI