Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bey, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  On hearing both sides on the stay application the appeal itself was taken up for disposal. 2. Credit of duty taken on capital goods amounting to Rs. 2,47,154/- was disallowed. Penalty of equal amount was imposed. The amount of Rs. 2,20,446/- earlier deposited by the assessee was appropriated. This order of the Joint Commissioner of Centra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... also the assessees had taken wrong credit, the reversal of the credit is upheld. The imposition of penalty was also correct. However, the quantum equivalent to the duty was not warranted. The Supreme Court in their order in the case of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Indore [1999 (112) E.L.T. 246 (Tribunal)] as held that in spite of the language of Section 11AC of th....