1999 (2) TMI 430

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i H.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. -  The appellant filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 31-3-92 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals). In the impugned order, the Collector of Central Excise held that the appeal is not filed against the adjudication order but against a letter asking the appellant to pay demand. Therefo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the High Court, the department of Revenue issued various show cause notices to the appellant demanding duty and these demands were later on confirmed. 4. Vide letter dated 16-1-92, the Assistant Collector directed the appellant to deposit the amount of Rs. 5,35,632.40. The appellant filed appeal against this letter, which was dismissed vide impugned order. 5. From the record, w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent appeal in this case is not against speaking and appealable adjudication order but against a letter communication asking them to pay demand after completion of necessary proceedings and after dismissal of appellants' writ petition by the High Court. From the contention of the appellant it is obvious to me that the demand is consequential in this case. The present appeal also cannot be treated a....