Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (9) TMI 413

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Ravinder Saroop, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.P. Nambiar, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  Heard the learned Advocate Shri R. Raghavan and the learned JDR Shri Ravinder Saroop. The matter is covered by the decision of the full Bench of the Tribunal reported in 1996 (81) E.L.T. 676 (T) in the case of Dai Ichi Karkaria. Hence, we grant the absolute stay and both the sides states that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that the case as above is distinguishable. 5. We have considered the submissions. It is now an admitted fact that the assessable value was calculated on the basis of the Rule 6B(ii) of Valuation Rules, 1975. Therefore, we are unable to understand as to how the decision of Dai Ichi Karkaria case of the full Bench is distinguished from the facts of the case. In view of the fact that it is ....