2001 (8) TMI 969

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. [Order per : M. Santhanam, Member (J)]. -  The department has come forward with this appeal. The ld. Counsel for the respondents has sent an application for an adjournment on the grounds that the respondent had to appear in a part heard case before the Kerala High Court and was unable to come to Delhi. The issue in this case is a covered case and hence we are of opini....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er. 3. The Tribunal had on several occasions considered the question of Dross and Skimmings. Recently, Order No. 576/86-B-I [C.C.E. Madras v. M/s Omega Cables] and Order No. 567/86-B-I [C.C.E. Guntur v. M/s Anam Electricals] the question of Dross and Skimmings was considered. In ED/SB/A/No. 522/83-B-I [M/s. Indian Aluminium Corporations v. C.C.E., Bangalore] and also in E/Appeal No. 550/83....