1994 (9) TMI 270
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p; Jagmohan Lai Aggarwal for the Appellant. Om Prakash for the Respondent. ORDER Mr. Justice R.N. Mittal, President - This appeal has been filed by the complainant against the order of the District Forum dated 22-10-1992 by which his claim has been rejected. 2. Briefly the facts are that the complainant purchased a large number of units of the opposite party (O.P.). The O.P. it is alle....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd that the complainant did not give the indemnity bond and, therefore, the payment was delayed. The complainant has come up in appeal. 4. It is contended by the appellant that the O.P. was bound to send the dividend warrant under registered cover but they failed to do so. Consequently if the dividend warrant was lost they were bound to send another dividend warrant without taking any indemnity....


TaxTMI