Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (4) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Appellant. S/Shri V. Lakshmikumaran and M.P. Devnath, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  Both Revenue and assessee are in appeal. The grievance of the assessee is that the impugned orders are in error in holding that duty was payable in respect of the labour cost involved in the replacement of parts during warranty period. The Reven....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the decision of the Tribunal in their own case, which has been reported in 2000 (124) E.L.T. 496. 4. The assessee has submitted that the issue of includibility of labour cost had been decided in favour of the assessees by the Tribunal in the case of Telco Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune - 2000 (121) E.L.T. 224 and that view of the Tribunal was confirmed by the Apex Court. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce that the dealer renders to cars of the respondent's manufacture. The civil appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs." 6. The appellants' case is covered by the rule laid down in the above decision of the Apex Court. The contrary decision of this Tribunal in the appellants' own case, reported in 2000 (124) E.L.T. 496 cannot continue to have effect after the judgment of the Apex Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....983 (14) E.L.T. 1896 (S.C.) = 1984 (1) SCR 347]. This plea is on the basis that the aforesaid two judgments of the Apex Court on the issue of inclusion of advertisement expenditure in the valuation of the excisable goods are required to be harmoniously construed. 8. The Revenue's appeal assumes that the two decisions of the Apex Court are in conflict. We find no warrant for that assumption....