2001 (7) TMI 963

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i R.C. Sankhla, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-original of the Commissioner dated 12-6-2000 vide which he had imposed a fine of Rs. 50,778/- and a personal penalty of Rs. 1,10,000/- on them. 2. Acting on a prior information the huge consignments of processed man-made fabrics, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ommissioner did not accept the version of the appellants for want of any corroborative evidence and imposed fine of Rs. 50,778/- and personal penalty of Rs. 1,10,000/- on them. 3. We have heard the Counsel and SDR and gone through the record. 4. The learned Counsel has contended that the appellants purchased the goods (processed fabrics) from the market against the bills and never ....