Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2001 (4) TMI 686

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - On matter being called nobody is present on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, I have heard Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, learned S.D.R. for the Revenue. 2. The appellant is aggrieved with the personal penalty of Rs. 3.50 lakhs imposed upon him. He is only owner of a transport company from the premises of which, a packet containing Raw Silk Yarn has been seized. The adjudicating authority....

PrevPreviousNextNext