2002 (2) TMI 703
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te, for the Appellant. Mrs. K.A. Mishra, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - In these applications M/s. South Eastern Coalfields have sought waiver of pre-deposit of Central Excise duty confirmed against them and penalty imposed by the Commissioner, Central Excise under three different Adjudication Orders. 2. Ms. S.S. Wandile, learned Advocate submit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e of them may be situated at a distance as far as 50 kilometers from the workshop concerned. She also referred to the definition of mines given in Cause (j) of Section 2 of the Mines Act and submitted that Workshop has to be situated away from the mines for safety reasons. 3. Opposing the prayer, M/s. Krishna Mishra, learned SDR, submitted that Workshop, as per notification, is required to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sions of both the sides. The Appellate Tribunal in the case of the applicant itself has denied the benefit of Notification vide Order No. 1929/2000-B, dated 30-11-2000 [2001 (127) E.L.T. 554 (T)]. It has been brought to our notice that though the leave for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 4562/2001 [2001 (130) E.L.T. A86 (S.C.)] was granted by the Supreme Court against the said decision, no int....
TaxTMI