Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (2) TMI 627

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  The appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise. 2. In the impugned order, the duty of Rs. 41,415.00 was confirmed against the appellants and a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- was imposed. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants' premises were searched and during verification, it was found that nine bags were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellants is that they had returned 1300 gunny bags to the manufacturer as these bags were defective and of poor quality. In respect of recovery of private records, their submission is that Sh. Sandeep Kumar, who had made the entries in the private records, could be trading in cement and charging commission. 6. During verification, Sh. Sandeep Kumar, an authorised representative of the appel....