1987 (1) TMI 415

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and S. Mazumdar for the Appearing Parties. JUDGMENT The present petitioners have moved this court in revision being aggrieved by the order dated January 4, 1986, by which the learned Metropolitan Magistrate rejected the prayer of the present petitioners for exemption from examination under section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and issuing a warrant of arrest. The petitioners who a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... prayer to be represented by their advocate under section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should have dispensed with their examination under section 313, Criminal Procedure Code, after the close of the prosecution evidence when the present petitioners themselves prayed for dispensing with their examination. In support, a decision of this court in Ramacast Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies[19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rom being examined under section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In this particular case, I do not find any reason whatsoever as to why the learned Magistrate rejected the application. He did not assign any reason. He did not indicate that there was any incriminating evidence against the petitioners which needed examination under section 313, Criminal Procedure Code. I also do not find t....