2002 (2) TMI 539

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Rajeev Tandon, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned Order-in-Original dated 19/21-6-2001 passed by the Commissioner vide which he had determined the duty liability of the appellants under sub-section (4) of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act. 2. The appellants are engaged in the m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....regarding fixation of the duty liability of the appellants on the basis of the actual production. The correctness of the duty amount as recorded in the impugned order, on determination under Section 3A(4) of the Act, has not been questioned before us. 4. The only grievance put forth by the learned Counsel is that after determination of the duty liability under sub-section (4) of Section 3A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore the Commissioner, at the time of passing of the impugned order, no fault can be found in the order. 6. We have heard both the sides and gone through the record. 7. The impugned order had been admittedly passed by the Commissioner on the request of the appellants under sub-section (4) of Section 3A of the Act, and he had determined their duty liability. It was for the appellants....