2002 (1) TMI 734

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  Heard. 2. The appellants have sought rectification of the impugned Final Order No. A/546/2001-NB(D), dated 27-6-2001 vide which their appeal along with three other connected appeals, was dismissed which was filed by them against the impugned order-in-original dated 31-5-2001 passed by the Commissioner determining the nature of the furnace insta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of appeal, took specific plea that their ACP had been wrongly determined by invoking the provisions of Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997. But this plea appears to have not considered by the Bench. The appeal of the appellants was dismissed only by holding that the furnace installed in their factory premises was pusher type, but this ground was, in fact,....