Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The appellants manufacture Flat Bars of Alloy Steel falling under sub-heading 7228.20. They are also availing the Modvat credit on the inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On 6-1-98, the preventive staff of Central Excise department visited the factory premises of the appellants. The visiting staff verified the stock of the end produc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ceedings were initiated which culminated in the Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Patiala passing an Order dated 18-12-98 in which, he ordered for the confiscation of 9.581 MTs of flat bars and 0.550 MTs scrap seized from the appellants under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. He however gave an option to the party to redeem the same on payment of fine of Rs. 40,000/- He directed that a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... authority that the entries in the statutory records could not be made after 4-1-98, as their excise clerk was on leave due to illness. They further clarified that the goods found in excess were manufactured from the raw material found short. There was a shortage of 6.572 MTs of raw material. It was contended that this raw material was issued for the manufacture of final products but the entries c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the appellants. The original authority has dismissed these submissions with the observation that the contention put forth by the party in their written submissions are not tenable being an afterthought, concocted and belated version. The Commissioner (Appeals) has also not examined these submissions in his order. He therefore requests that the submissions made by the appellants before the lower....