2002 (1) TMI 537
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri Thomas George, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) (Oral)]. - These are five appeals filed by the appellants, George Kurian & others with reference to the common impugned order. The issue involved herein is common in all these appeals, hence they are taken together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. Shri Lakshminarayanan, ld. Adv....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on the job work basis. On examining the matter the Tribunal had come to a conclusion that since the pleas raised by party were not properly considered by the authorities below, and accordingly the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to decide the matter afresh after taking into consideration the pleas raised by the party. He submitted that the authorities below have not followed the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ceded that order for confiscation of plant and machinery was not in the original order though they are mentioned in the show cause notice, since it was dropped in the adjudication proceedings. He also conceded that the quantum of penalty has been enhanced in the subsequent order on remand. 4. We have carefully considered the matter. We find that there is a justification in the arguments ad....
TaxTMI