Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (1) TMI 519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri A.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - These are two applications filed by M/s. ICI India Ltd. for waiver of pre-deposit as under : Duty : Rs. 1,12,25,434/- and Rs. 31,99,921/- Penalty : Rs. 1,12,25,434/- and Rs. 10,00,000/- 2. Shri A.R. Madhav Rao, learned Advocate submitted that the applicants manufacture rubber process....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d issued to them has been dropped by the then Commissioner of Central Excise under Adjudication Order No. 29/2000, dated 29-10-2000 by extending the benefit of Notification No. 217/86-C.E., dated 2-4-86 and Notification 67/95-C.E.. The learned Advocate also mentioned that under Board's Circular No. 22/71/CX. 6, dated 30-10-71, it is permissible for the manufacturers to effect transfer of damaged o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....= 2000 (39) RLT 565 (CEGAT)] wherein CI sleepers which were broken and captively remelted were held to be eligible for the benefit of Notification 217/86. Reliance was also placed on the decision in the case of U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. CCE reported in [1999 (107) E.L.T. 674] and Tide Industries v. CCE reported in [2001 (133) E.L.T. 426]. 2. Opposing the prayer, Shri A.K. Jain, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se of CCE v. Supreme Industries reported in 1999 (109) E.L.T. 704 (T), relied upon by the learned Advocate, the assessee had duly informed the Department about the removal of the goods for reprocessing/recycling which is not so in the present matter. 3. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. Learned Advocate has shown the documents for the movement of goods for reprocessing ....