Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (10) TMI 617

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tiable. Accordingly, the appellants availed the benefit of Modvat credit in respect of the inputs used in the manufacture of such Plastic Tanks. However, no duty was paid by them on the Plastic Tanks of a capacity of less than 300 litres, inasmuch as the same were exempted in terms of Notification No. 15/94-C.E., dated 1-3-94. One of the conditions of the said Notification was that Modvat credit has not been availed in respect of the inputs used in the manufacture of the said goods. Accordingly, the appellant firm was reversing back the Modvat credit initially availed on the inputs used in the manufacture of the said exempted final product. 1.1. Subsequently, the appellants were issued a show cause notice on 2-6-99 alleging that dur....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the entire process of pulverisation of granules into powder was under the knowledge of the Revenue inasmuch as the granules have to be necessarily first grounded to manufacture their final product. 1.5. The Commissioner while adjudicating the case did not accept the appellants' contention and relied upon Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 39, which is to the effect that change of one primary form (plastic granules) to another primary form (Plastic Moulding Powder) in respect of the goods falling under Heading Nos. 39.01 to 39.14, would amount to manufacture. He also rejected the appellants' contention as regards the marketability of the production and the limitation, and confirmed the duty of Rs. 28,86,429.00 (Rupees twenty-eight lakh eight....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the time of taking out licence, they had submitted a blue-print to the Central Excise Authorities and Pulverizing Machine Section has been clearly shown in the said blue-print. As such, it cannot be said that the appellants had suppressed any fact from the Revenue with an intent to evade payment of duty. He also submitted that the duty was not being paid because the appellants were under a bona fide belief that Plastic Moulding Powder coming into existence at the intermediate stage and being a non-marketable commodity, is not excisable. Referring to the various decisions, he prays for setting aside the penalty on the point of limitation. 2.2. Shri Chattopadhyay, learned Consultant also argues that in case of confirmation of the dem....