2001 (12) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pta, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri P.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - Appeal Nos. E/1469-1471/2001-A - These appeals arise out of orders passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi in Order-in-Appeal Nos. 442 to 446-C.E./DLH/2001, dated 19-4-2001. 2. It is submitted before us by both sides that the common issue i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he claim of the appellant for the reason that COT was not shown to have been incurred by the appellants and included in the invoice price charged from the depot. It was noted that while COT was separately shown in the invoice from the factory to the depot, it was not shown in the invoice from the depot to the buyers premises. It was found that the appellant has taken into consideration 60% of its ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... expenses incurred for fuel, Salaries of Drivers, Conductors, Helpers and also the total material shifted to the godown during the relevant period. They opined that the time and cost for shifting of material from depot to customer is considered at 60% of the total time and cost incurred which is reasonable after going through the records. Therefore, the ratio between the depot to customer's premis....