2001 (10) TMI 474

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....S. Agarwal, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides. The application for rectification of mistake is filed by the Revenue. 2. The contention of the Revenue is that in para 3 of the Final Order Nos. 205-206/2001-B, dated 17-4-2001 [2001 (131) E.L.T. 399 (Tribunal)] the classification of 'Hal Ki Noke' was held to be under sub-heading 84....