Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (10) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ginal which are detailed as under : Name of the Party Duty amount imposed Penalty imposed Pre-deposit to be made : 1. M/s. Haryana Petro Rs. 2,52,77,940 Rs. 2,50,00,000 Rs. 1 crore towards duty Rs. 80 lakhs towards penalty 2. Shri Rajiv Agarwal -- Rs. 20 lakhs Rs. 4 lakhs 3. M/s. Globe Synthetics Ltd. -- Rs. 8 lakhs Rs. 6 lakhs 4. Shri Rakesh Gupta -- Rs. 20 lakhs Rs. 4 lakhs 2. The pre-deposit of the amounts by all these appellants were ordered to be made within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of order. But they had failed to do so. 3. The appellants have moved the present rectification of mistake applications seeking modification in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ench has not allowed unconditional waiver of the pre-deposit of the duty and penalty amounts to both the companies by following the decision of the Tribunal in M/s. Madhu Milan Syntex Ltd. v. CCE, Indore - 2000 (117) E.L.T. 139. 6. The other ground on which all the appellants have sought modification of the impugned stay order is that in another appeal filed by M/s. Emmtex Synthetics Pvt. Ltd., the Bench while dealing with the statement of Shri B.M. Gupta, Vice President of the Company - M/s. Haryana Petro Chemicals Ltd., on whose evidence the present appellants had been also charged and burdened with the duties and penalties, had observed that his evidence could not be used as a substantive piece of evidence as he did not submit hi....