Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1966 (10) TMI 111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Gopalakrishnan, for the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 195 of 1966.   S. Shaukat Hussain, for the respondents in Sivil Appeals Nos. 192 to 194 of 1966.   --------------------------------------------------   The judgment of the Court was delivered by   SHAH, J.-The respondents are dealers in tobacco and tobacco products and were assessed to sales tax for the years 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; In view of the judgment of this Court in The State of Madras v. Swasthik Tobacco Factory [1966] 17 S.T.C. 316., and The State of Madras v. M/s. Bell Mark Tobacco Company C. As. Nos. 1071-1077 of 1965 decided on October 4, 1966; [1967] 19 S.T.C. 129.,counsel for the respondents have not sought to contend that they were entitled to deduction of the excise duty paid on raw tobacco in the compu....