Home / 
2001 (6) TMI 589
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- 4-6-2001<br>E/5009/89 - 842/2001<br>Central Excise<br>Order-in-Appeal<br>S/Shri S.L. Peeran, Jeet Ram Kait, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : None, for the Appellant. Shri S. Kannan, DR, for the Respondent. [....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sement 'left'. Appellants are not in existence. In similar circumstances, the Apex Court dismissed the Revenue appeal in the case of CCE v. Electrolytic Foils Ltd. reported in 1997 (91) E.L.T. 543 (S.....