Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1981 (8) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 433(1)(f) of the Companies Act, 1956, is made by one of the shareholders, an ex-director of the company, praying for an order of winding-up on just and equitable grounds. Respondent No. 1-company was formed under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The nominal capital of the company at the time of incorporation was Rs. 2,00,000 divided into 2,000 sha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the provisions to the contrary contained in the articles of association of the company. It was solely on the ground that she absented herself from three consecutive board meetings, with reference to which the company appears to have filed a return to the Registrar as required, stating that she ceased to be a director of the company. Petitioner has claimed that the same is illegal as she had not re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....how a shareholder can move for winding up of the company on that ground. No doubt the company has stopped its business somewhere in the year 1980. But the said letter at annex. B dated November 8, 1980, clearly indicates that some of the shareholders, at least, are interested in the working of the company once again. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision of the House ....