2000 (6) TMI 650

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri K.M. Patwari, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.N. Srinivasan, Member (J)]. - This is an application for waiver of demand of duty of Rs. 20,33,845 and penalty of equivalent amount under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and another penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed under Rule 173Q of the Rules. 2. The appellant is manufacturing Electrical Apparatu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sel appeared for the applicant and Shri K.M. Patwari the ld. JDR appeared for the Revenue. 4. Shri J.C. Patel states that the order suffers gravely inasmuch as the impugned order assumed that the appellant had used somebody's trade mark. Whereas infact, they have affixed the applicants own trade mark not the trade mark or house mark of their foreign collaborator. He states further that par....