2000 (8) TMI 818
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The prayer in the application is for dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of penalty amount of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Arguing on the application, Shri Ramesh Kumar Chowdhury, learned Advocate along wi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....emises and they used to import electronic items, computer parts etc. and the firm ceased operation since 1995. He submits that in the light of this clear report of the investigating officer, there was no justification for holding the appellant as the importer of the silk yarn in question to impose personal penalty upon them. 3. We have heard Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, learned SDR who reiterates....
TaxTMI