2000 (3) TMI 770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri K.L. Ramteke, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - On hearing the stay application it appeared that on the point of law the appeal could be taken up for disposal. Both the sides agreeing, this was done after granting waiver of the condition of pre-deposit of Rs. 5,13,682/- confirmed as duty and also Rs. 1 lakh (Rupees one lakh only) imposed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tional (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-II]. In this judgment it was held that the Commissioner was wrong in dismissing the appeal for non-compliance of Section 35F without granting personal hearing and without considering application for re-consideration. The facts being identical we will follow the ratio of this judgment. 3. The facts involved in this case however, are p....