Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (10) TMI 531

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order]. -  The appellant is aggrieved with that portion of the impugned order which imposes personal penalty of Rs. 1 1akh upon him under the provision of Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. I have heard Shri P.R. Biswas, ld. Consultant and Shri T.P. Kumar, ld. SDR. 3. The appellant was found travelling in a truck which was intercepted by the Customs authoritie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....persons, penalty of Rs. 1 lakh was also imposed on the appellant which is under challenge. 5. The case of the appellant is that though he escorted the goods from Nepal to the point of interception, but he was totally innocent inasmuch as he had no concern with the contraband goods of foreign origin. He was merely asked by his employer to accompany the consignment of dry ginger up to Delhi ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct that after these unknown people signalled the truck to be stopped, they held a talk with the appellant and the other occupants of the truck. As such it is clear that the appellant was in knowledge of the entire scheme of replacing the ginger bags with the silk. He also submitted that in any case carrying of ginger from Nepal without a licence and without observing other formalities is also an o....