Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1955 (9) TMI 39

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mi Iyengar, Senior Advocate (S. Subramaniam, Advocate, with him), for the appellants. K.B. Asthana and C.P. Lal, Advocates, for the intervener. V.K.T. Chari, Advocate-General of Madras (R. Ganapathy Iyer, K. Veeraswami and P.G. Gokhale, Advocates, with him), for the respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR, J.-This appeal comes before us on leave granted ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer, the Commercial Tax Officer of Malabar and the Board of Revenue. Thereupon, he filed a suit O.S. No. 25 of 1948 in the Subordinate Judge's Court, Cochin, for a declaration that the assess- ment was unauthorised, illegal, and ultra vires. The Subordinate Judge dismissed his suit, and on appeal, the High Court of Madras upheld the dismissal but gave the plaintiff leave to appeal on the grou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was properly assessed. Mr. K.S. Krishnaswamy Iyengar, the learned counsel for the appellant, challenged firstly the finding that the contracts of sale were entered into in Fort Cochin, and he contended that there was no evidence to justify it. There is the evidence of the 3rd witness for the defendant in support of the finding. Further, the plaintiff did not set out any such plea in his reply to t....