Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 608

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri G. Sreekumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - This appeal is against the demand of duty and imposition of penalty. The duty demanded is Rs. 63,900/- and the penalty imposed is equal to the amount of duty, under Section 11AC of the C.E. Act, 1944. 2. Arguing the case for the appellants Shri A. Vijayaraghavan, learned Consultant submits th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., New Delhi. He submits that therefore, imposition of penalty equal to the amount of duty of Rs. 63,900/- is not warranted and even if it was warranted, it was out of proportion. He submits that the penalty may be either waived or reduced drastically. 3. Shri G. Sreekumar Menon, learned SDR submits that the contention regarding up gradation of computers was not raised by the appellants ear....