Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (5) TMI 738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. - The Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, Cuttack-I division disallowed Modvat credit of Rs. 33,815/- and imposed penalty of Rs. 5,000/- upon the respondents on the ground that the invoice issued by regd. depot owned by M/s. IOC Ltd. has shown more duty payment than what was actually paid by the manufacturer and as a result there has been excess amount of duty reflected in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner to find out the reasons for the difference in duty paid by the manufacturer and as to whether the duty shown and paid as per dealer's invoice is correct or not. The Revenue having felt aggrieved with the said order of the Commissioner (Appeals) has filed the present appeal. 3. I have heard Shri J.M. Kenedy, ld. JDR for the Revenue. Nobody is present on behalf of the respondents. 4.....