Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (1) TMI 610

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. -  This is an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. M. Cus. 488/97, dated 1-5-97 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) with respect to spectacle frames in knocked down condition imported under two Bills of Entry dated 18-7-96. 2. Briefly, the issue concerns alleged unauthorised import thereof as the Advance Release Order dated 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Bench, he submitted that the Bill of Lading was dated 10-5-96. Ld. Advocate seeks further relief in the quantum of redemption fine on the ground that they obtained advance release order dated 28-6-96 issued by DGFT and therefore imported the goods under bona fide belief that they had necessary legal authority to do so, particularly when DGFT had issued a show cause notice against the licence on 14....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....led down further. He submits that imposition of redemption fine is normally on the basis of margin of profit which can be calculated by a well settled formula concerning the market price minus landed cost etc. He also submits that appellants have not submitted any evidence that market price is so low that the margin of profit of 25% now imposed is not realistic. 5. We have carefully consid....