AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2001 (7) TMI 462
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Shri A.K. Jain, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - The appellants are a Public Sector Corporation manufacturing Petroleum product. Rates of duty on certain goods were raised vide Finance Bill, 1996. The appellants however continued to clear the products at the old rates up to 16-8-1996. They however paid the differential duty on being pointed out by the depart....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt and set aside the orders of imposition of penalty and recovery of interest under these provisions. 3. Counsel also contested penalty of Rs. 20,000/-. He submits that Rule 9(2) is not attracted and that Rule 173Q(1)(a) also had no application. We find that the Rule 173F puts the burden of determination of the correct duty payable on the goods to be cleared. In the present case it is not ....