AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1951 (9) TMI 27
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....NT Kapur, J. - This is a rule directed against an order passed by Mr. Chandar Gupt Suri, Subordinate Judge of the 1st Class, Delhi, holding that Delhi Courts have jurisdiction to try the suit. On the 1st of September 1947, the Jagjit Sugar Mills Company, Limited, insured some goods for one month against riot risk. These goods were at Jaijon. On the 6th September, 1947, 113 bags of shakkar ar....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the courts had jurisdiction because of a letter Ex. P8. The insurers have come up in revision to this court and rule was issued by me on the 18th July, 1951. The suit has been brought at Delhi because of the warranty, the ground being that as the former Lahore office is now located at New Delhi therefore in accordance with the terms of the warranty all claims have to be settled in Delhi and the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ituation of its principal place of business. The mere fact that in accordance with some of the letters which have been produced, and Exhibit P8 is a principal one of them, the former office has now been shifted to New Delhi would not also transfer the right of the plaintiff to bring a suit at Delhi. The place of suing is governed by section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure and in regard to incorp....