AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2000 (12) TMI 527
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....el, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri T.D. Bodade, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Appellant manufactures metal containers. It manufactured these containers out of cold rolled steel coils. These are cut into required length and thereafter punched or cut into required sizes and shapes of material. The question for consideration in this appeal is the clas....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ap. They were described as scrap and sold to scrap dealers. There was nothing to show that the goods were classifiable under the heading claimed by the department 72.09 as flat rolled product. The Assistant Commissioner did not accept this contention. He however, ordered classification of the goods not under heading 72.09 of the tariff, proposed in the notice but under heading 7211.90. This was fo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ich was proposed in the notice under heading 7211.90 is different from the one confirmed, 7211.91. The question of quoting a wrong rule which has been used by the Assistant Commissioner to tide over this objection raised by the assessee is no answer. This is not a case of citing a wrong rule but a specific classification. It is settled that a classification other than the one proposed in the notic....