2000 (6) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M. Kunhikannan, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. - To get this appeal heard, appellants are required to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 4,12,480/- confirmed as duty vide Order-in-Original No. 3/98, dated 28-7-1998 which has been upheld by Order-in-Appeal No. 40/99(V)CE, dated 8-9-1999 passed by Commissioner (Appeals). 2. Heard Shri S. Ramnath, ld. Represen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Therefore, the decision has been taken by the order impugned ex parte and there is clear denial of principles of natural justice. Therefore, he seeks for remand for de novo consideration of the matter. 3. Heard Shri M. Kunhikannan, ld. DR who reiterates the order-in-appeal impugned and the attendant order-in-original. 4. We have carefully considered these rival submissions and we f....