2001 (1) TMI 586

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C. Patel, Advocate and Vipin Kumar Jain, C.A , for the Appellant. Shri T.D. Bodade, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Appeal E/1669/97 is against the order of the Commissioner classifying the products manufactured by the appellant under Chapter 39 of the Tariff, instead of under Chapter 29 as claimed by the appellant. Appeal E/1670 is by B.S. Shetty, Dire....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0, PEG 600 manufactured by the one of the appellants before us. It had concluded that classification to be under Chapter 29, excluding the classification of these goods as plastics under Chapter 39. The departmental representative is unable to show any reason as to why ratio of this decision should not be followed. 3. Accordingly, the classification claimed by S.M. Dyechem of its product o....