Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (12) TMI 503

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - The issue for consideration in this appeal is of the classification of the product "Switch Fuse Unit". The assessees claimed classification under sub-heading 8537. The department classified these products under sub-heading 8536.90. For ease or reference the two entities are reproduced below :    85.36 Electrical apparatus for switc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of heading No. 85.17. 16% 2. Heading 85.36 covers individual apparatus these can be : (i)  for Switching (ii) protecting electrical circuits or (iii) for making connections to; or in electrical circuits. When the apparatus with such individuals functions are put together mounted on a Board or Panel or similar base such a combination would merit classification....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....speak of question of classification either under Chapter 84 or 85 and was not relevant to the proceedings before him. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted that the subject goods had two different apparatus integrated into one unit. He however did not accept the product as an assembly. He classified it at one product performing two functions. We find that the Commissioner's observation does not brin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ical products had come up for consideration of the Tribunal, in the earlier decisions namely Havell's Industries v. Collector of Central Excise [1993 (68) E.L.T. 353 (Tribunal)] and Collector of Central Excise v. V.S. Engineers [1993 (68) E.L.T. 899 (Tribunal)]. Both these decisions classified similar products under Heading 85.37 which judgments were later upheld by the Supreme Court. Although the....