2000 (11) TMI 648
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri A. Chopra, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - M/s. Maersk India Limited, the appellant before us, filed on behalf of the master of its ship Thomas Maersk, an import manifest on 1st January, 1996, when she called at Nhava Sheva. On 4th January, 1996 the slot charter agent sought permission to file a supplementary manifest for the same ship, seeki....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion 111 of the Act. Advocate for the appellant does not deny the contravention of Clauses (f) and (g). The cargo initially unmanifested is liable to confiscation under clause (g). It was unloaded before any manifest was filed for it, clearly in contravention of provisions of Section 30 of the Act. 3. We also note that the cargo initially unmanifested was 2/3rd of the total cargo of the sh....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI